SOLID Principles in Java
🌟 SOLID Principles in Java (OOP Best Practices)
SOLID is an acronym that stands for:
-
S – Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
-
O – Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
-
L – Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
-
I – Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
-
D – Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
1️⃣ Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
A class should have only one reason to change.
💡 Meaning:
Each class should do one thing and do it well. It should have only one responsibility or job.
✅ Benefits:
-
Easier to maintain and test
-
Encourages modular design
🧱 Example (Violation):
✅ Correct Design:
2️⃣ Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
Software entities should be open for extension but closed for modification.
💡 Meaning:
You should be able to add new functionality without changing existing code.
✅ Benefits:
-
Avoids breaking existing code
-
Encourages plugin-like behavior
🧱 Example Using Polymorphism:
3️⃣ Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types without altering the correctness of the program.
💡 Meaning:
If class B
is a subclass of A
, then we should be able to use B
wherever A
is expected without unexpected behavior.
❌ Violation Example:
✅ Better Design:
4️⃣ Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
Clients should not be forced to depend on interfaces they do not use.
💡 Meaning:
Use many small, specific interfaces instead of one large, general-purpose interface.
❌ Violation:
✅ Correct Design:
5️⃣ Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
High-level modules should not depend on low-level modules. Both should depend on abstractions.
💡 Meaning:
Classes should depend on interfaces or abstract classes, not concrete implementations.
❌ Violation:
✅ Correct Design (using abstraction):
🔄 Summary Table
Principle | Definition | Goal |
---|---|---|
SRP | One class = one responsibility | Maintainability |
OCP | Extend, don’t modify existing code | Scalability |
LSP | Subtypes replace base types safely | Robustness |
ISP | Use specific interfaces | Flexibility |
DIP | Depend on abstractions, not concretes | Loose Coupling |
Comments
Post a Comment